Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Acetone from cumene production; technology mix; production mix, at plant; 100% active substance (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location EU+EFTA+UK
Reference year 2017
Name
Base name ; Treatment, standards, routes ; Mix and location types ; Quantitative product or process properties
Acetone from cumene production; technology mix; production mix, at plant; 100% active substance
Use advice for data set Notice: this data set supersedes the EF3.0-compliant version (see link under "preceding data set version" below calculated with the EF3.0). The life cycle inventory is not changed from the original EF3.0 data set. The LCIA results are calculated based on the EF3.1 methods which provide updated characterisation factors in the following impact categories: Climate Change, Ecotoxicity freshwater, Photochemical Ozone Formation, Acidification, Human Toxicity non-cancer, and Human Toxicity cancer. The review report and the data quality ratings refer to the original results. The data set has been updated by the European Commission on the basis of the original EF3.0 data set delivered by the data provider.
Synonyms Acetone; 2-propanone; Propanone; Dimethyl ketone; Methyl ketone; Dimethylformaldehyde;
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • ILCD: Materials production / Organic chemicals
General comment on data set TYPE OF DATASET Each chemical compound is provided in aggregated (LCI results) and level-1 disaggregated (unit process, single operation) form. For more information, see the report (ecoinvent Association, 2020, Data on the Production of Chemicals created for the EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) transition phase implementation, www.ecoinvent.org, ecoinvent Association, Zurich, Switzerland). This dataset represents the LCI results. PROCESS DESCRIPTION Acetone is mainly used as a solvent in the chemical industry (Gallardo Hipolito 2011). Acetone is a co-product of the cumene phenol process, also known as the Hock process (Gallardo Hipolito 2011). Phenol global production in 2008 was of 9.9 million tons, of which 98.5% was produced through this process (SRI consulting). Global production of acetone is around 5.5 million metric tons (Gallardo Hipolito 2011). The activity starts when the raw materials enter the process. Materials entering the process are included as well as energy uses, infrastructure and emissions. References ecoinvent (2017) Data on the Production of Chemicals created for the EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) pilot phase implementation, www.ecoinvent.org, ecoinvent Association, Zürich, Switzerland Gendorf (2016) Umwelterklärung 2015, Werk Gendorf Industriepark, www.gendorf.de Gallardo Hipolito, M. 2011. Life Cycle Assessment of platform chemicals from fossil and lignocellulosic biomass scenarios LCA of phenolic compounds, solvent, soft and hard plastic precursors. Master in Industrial Ecology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Energy and Process Engineering. Retrieved from: http://daim.idi.ntnu.no/masteroppgaver/006/6362/tittelside.pdf, accessed 6 January 2017 SRI consulting. In: Gallardo Hipolito, M. 2011. Life Cycle Assessment of platform chemicals from fossil and lignocellulosic biomass scenarios LCA of phenolic compounds, solvent, soft and hard plastic precursors. Master in Industrial Ecology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Energy and Process Engineering. Retrieved from: http://daim.idi.ntnu.no/masteroppgaver/006/6362/tittelside.pdf, accessed 6 January 2017 Gallardo Hipolito, M. 2011. Life Cycle Assessment of platform chemicals from fossil and lignocellulosic biomass scenarios LCA of phenolic compounds, solvent, soft and hard plastic precursors. Master in Industrial Ecology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Energy and Process Engineering. Retrieved from: http://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/14718/Life%20Cycle%20Assessment%20of%20platform%20chemicals%20from%20fossil%20and%20lignocelulose%20scenarios.%20Martin%20Gallardo.pdf?sequence=2, accessed 6 January 2017 Saygin, D. 2009. Chemical and Petrochemical Sector Potential of best practice technology and other measures for improving energy efficiency. IEA information paper. IEA/OECD. Retrieved from: https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/chemical_petrochemical_sector.pdf, accessed 6 January 2017 Water content of the reference product: 0.0 kg Biogenic carbon content of the reference product: 0.0 kg DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT The data quality ratings for the datasets were determined as the average of the 5 individual ratings for Technological Representativeness, Geographical Representativeness, Time-related representativeness, Precision/uncertainty, and implementation of the End of Life Formula. The final scores for these 5 descriptors were determined by the independent, external reviewer after a discussion with the internal reviewers. The basis for this determination was generally a contribution analysis of the material and energy inputs as well as direct resource uses and emissions. This process was required by the tender. The contribution analysis is based on the most important flows in the dataset, defined in the tender specifications as "the unit processes contributing cumulatively to at least to 80% of the total environmental impact based on characterised and normalised results". In addition to unit processes, direct emissions also qualified as input exchanges for this approach. For the normalization, the normalisation factors "EC-JRC Global (2010 or 2013), per person" available at http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/?page_id=140 were used. For each parameter, the DQR scores were chosen to best reflect the conditions and quality of the amount value, the appropriateness of the chosen exchange for the specific needs of the system under analysis, and the quality of the foreground and background data for aggregated inputs of exchanges from the technosphere, i.e. not direct emissions or resource uses. ENERGY AND TRANSPORT INFORMATION SOURCE Energy and transport was used in both the foreground and background of this dataset. When building the dataset, energy and transport demands were supplied directly by datasets provided by Sphera. The background for every other input from technosphere uses a modified version of the ecoinvent database, created specifically for the PEF. In this version, every instance of energy and transport supply, anywhere in the database, was replaced by a dataset from Sphera. This ensures that every demand for energy and transport, in the foreground and in the background, is supplied by a Sphera dataset. BILL OF MATERIALS The bill of material includes the following inputs: chemical factory, organics: 1.84575859807e-10 unit cumene: 0.620333595218 kg heat, in chemical industry: 1.08438317636 MJ nitrogen, liquid: 0.00876735334082 kg tap water: 0.0119974308874 kg wastewater, average: -1.2458870537e-06 m3 Electricity: 0.191958894199 kWh. NOT INCLUDED EXCHANGES All known elementary exchanges are included. PROCESS DIAGRAM LEGEND The file 'Diagram of data for chemicals EF3.0' presents the general structure of the processes created for the EF chemical data. A complete flow diagram for the selected process is available in the relevant section.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2024
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Acetone is produced as a co-product of the cumene phenol process (Hock process). This process consists first in the production of cumene from the reaction of benzene and propylene. Cumene then reacts with oxygen to give phenol and acetone. For each kilogram of phenol produced, 0.63 kg of acetone are obtained. For the process 0.6 MJ/kg of electricity and 9.1 MJ/kg of steam are required per kg of phenol and 0.2 MJ/kg of electricity and 9.8 MJ/kg of steam required per kg of acetone (Saygin 2009). Chemical reaction: C9H12 + O2 -> C6H6O + C3H6O This inventory representing production of a particular chemical compound is at least partially based on a generic model on the production of chemicals. The data generated by this model have been improved by compound-specific data when available. The model on production of chemicals is using specific industry or literature data wherever possible and more generic data on chemical production processes to fill compound-specific data gaps when necessary. The basic principles of the model have been published in literature (Hischier 2005, Establishing Life Cycle Inventories of Chemicals Based on Differing Data Availability). The model has been updated and extended with newly available data from the chemical industry. In the model, unreacted fractions are treated in a waste treatment process, and emissions reported are after a waste treatment process that is included in the scope of this dataset. For volatile reactants, a small level of evaporation is assumed. Solvents and catalysts are mostly recycled in closed-loop systems within the scope of the dataset and reported flows are for losses from this system. For more detailed description of the model see the sectorial report (ecoinvent (2017) Data on the Production of Chemicals created for the EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) pilot phase implementation, www.ecoinvent.org, ecoinvent Association, Zürich, Switzerland).
Flow diagram(s) or picture(s)
  • Diagram of Acetone from cumene production - EU+EFTA+UK - EF3.0 Image
  • Diagram of data for chemicals EF3.0 Image
LCI method and allocation
Type of data set LCI result
LCI Method Principle Attributional
Deviation from LCI method principle / explanations The background data use the "Recycled content cut-off" approach to allocate end-of-life by-products and secondary materials. This allocation is explained in the description of the recycled content system model (http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/system-models-in-ecoinvent-3/cut-off-system-model/allocation-cut-off-by-classification.html).
LCI method approaches
  • Allocation - market value
Deviations from LCI method approaches / explanations Allocation following the ISO 14044 hierarchy.
Modelling constants All modelling constants follow the requirements of the Guide for EF compliant data sets version 2.0 (JRC, 2020). Completeness: All known environmental flows are included. All known resource uses and emissions are listed in the inventory. Water use: water use is modelled at country level using separate flows for water withdrawal, water release and water evaporation. Cut-off: All known environmental flows are included. All known resource uses and emissions are listed in the inventory. Handling multi-functional processes: the following PEF multi- functionality decision hierarchy is applied for resolving all multi- functionality problems: (1) subdivision or system expansion; (2) allocation based on a relevant underlying physical relationship (substitution may apply here); (3) allocation based on some other relationship. Direct land use change: GHG emissions from direct LUC allocated to good/service for 20 years after the LUC occurs, with IPCC default values. Carbon storage and delayed emissions: credits associated with temporary (carbon) storage or delayed emissions up to 300 years are not be considered. Emissions off-setting: are not included. Capital goods (including infrastructures) and their End of life: they are included. System boundaries: system boundaries include all processes linked to the product supply chain (e.g. maintenance). Time period: emissions and removals are modelled as if released or removed at the beginning of the assessment method. Fossil and biogenic carbon emissions and removals: removals and emissions are modelled as follows: All GHG emissions from fossil fuels (including peat and limestone) are modelled consistently with the most updated EF list of elementary flows. The non-fossil (biogenic) carbon flows are modelled consistently with the most updated EF list of elementary flows.</
Deviation from modelling constants / explanations None
Data sources, treatment and representativeness
Data cut-off and completeness principles All known environmental flows are included. All known resource uses and emissions are listed in the inventory. The dataset dry mass balance has been checked to ensure the inventory is complete. Capital goods (e.g. infrastructure) and their end-of-life are included.
Deviation from data cut-off and completeness principles / explanations None
Data selection and combination principles These datasets include, in both their foreground and background data, links to energy and transport data provided specifically for the PEF transition phase. The relevant background data on energy and transport are from the existing LCDN data node (http://lcdn.thinkstep.com/Node/). All other background data in the supply chain of this product are from the ecoinvent v3.3 database (www.ecoinvent.org).
Deviation from data selection and combination principles / explanations None
Data treatment and extrapolations principles Several data sources have been used to model the inventory.
Deviation from data treatment and extrapolations principles / explanations None
Uncertainty adjustments None
Completeness
Completeness of product model All relevant flows quantified
Supported impact assessment methods
  • Resource use, minerals and metals
  • Photochemical ozone formation - human health
  • EF-particulate matter
  • Ionising radiation, human health
  • Human toxicity, non-cancer_organics
  • Human toxicity, non-cancer_inorganics
  • Human toxicity, non-cancer
  • Human toxicity, cancer_organics
  • Human toxicity, cancer_inorganics
  • Human toxicity, cancer
  • Eutrophication, terrestrial
  • Ecotoxicity, freshwater_organics
  • Ecotoxicity, freshwater_inorganics
  • Ecotoxicity, freshwater
  • Climate change-Land use and land use change
  • Climate change-Fossil
  • Climate change-Biogenic
  • Climate change
  • Acidification
Completeness elementary flows, per topic
  • Climate change: All relevant flows quantified
  • Ozone depletion: All relevant flows quantified
  • Summer smog: All relevant flows quantified
  • Eutrophication: All relevant flows quantified
  • Acidification: All relevant flows quantified
  • Human toxicity: All relevant flows quantified
  • Freshwater ecotoxicity: All relevant flows quantified
  • Seawater eco-toxicity: All relevant flows quantified
  • Terrestric eco-toxicity: All relevant flows quantified
  • Radioactivity: All relevant flows quantified
  • Land use: All relevant flows quantified
  • Non-renewable material resource depletion: All relevant flows quantified
  • Renewable material resource consumption: All relevant flows quantified
  • Non-renewable primary energy depletion: All relevant flows quantified
  • Renewable primary energy consumption: All relevant flows quantified
  • Particulate matter/respiratory inorganics: All relevant flows quantified
  • Species depletion: No statement
  • Noise: No statement
Validation
Type of review Scope / Method(s) of review Data quality indicators
Dependent internal review
Scope name Method name
LCIA results
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Cross-check with other data set
  • Expert judgement
LCI results or Partly terminated system
  • Element balance
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Validation of data sources
  • Compliance with ISO 14040 to 14044
  • Energy balance
  • Mass balance
  • Expert judgement
  • Cross-check with other data set
  • Sample tests on calculations
Life cycle inventory methods
  • Compliance with ISO 14040 to 14044
Unit process(es), black box
  • Element balance
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Validation of data sources
  • Compliance with ISO 14040 to 14044
  • Energy balance
  • Mass balance
  • Expert judgement
  • Cross-check with other data set
  • Sample tests on calculations
Documentation
  • Compliance with ISO 14040 to 14044
  • Expert judgement
Unit process(es), single operation
  • Documentation
  • Element balance
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Validation of data sources
  • Compliance with ISO 14040 to 14044
  • Energy balance
  • Mass balance
  • Expert judgement
  • Cross-check with other data set
  • Sample tests on calculations
Raw data
  • Documentation
  • Element balance
  • Cross-check with other source
  • Validation of data sources
  • Energy balance
  • Mass balance
  • Expert judgement
  • Sample tests on calculations
  • Overall quality: Good - 1.75
  • Methodological appropriateness and consistency: Not applicable - 3.0
  • Precision: Good - 2.0
  • Geographical representativeness: Good - 2.0
  • Time representativeness: Very good - 1.0
  • Technological representativeness: Good - 2.0
Reviewer name and institution
Type of review Data quality indicators
Independent review panel
  • Overall quality: Good - 1.75
  • Methodological appropriateness and consistency: Not applicable - 3.0
  • Precision: Good - 2.0
  • Geographical representativeness: Good - 2.0
  • Time representativeness: Very good - 1.0
  • Technological representativeness: Good - 2.0
Reviewer name and institution Complete review report
Compliance Declarations
Compliance
Compliance system name
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant
Review compliance
Fully compliant
Documentation compliance
Fully compliant
Quality compliance
Fully compliant
Compliance
Compliance system name
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant
Review compliance
Fully compliant
Documentation compliance
Fully compliant
Quality compliance
Not defined
Compliance
Compliance system name
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant
Review compliance
Fully compliant
Documentation compliance
Fully compliant
Quality compliance
Fully compliant
Compliance
Compliance system name
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant
Nomenclature compliance
Not defined
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant
Review compliance
Fully compliant
Documentation compliance
Not defined
Quality compliance
Not defined
Compliance
Compliance system name
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant
Nomenclature compliance
Not defined
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant
Review compliance
Not defined
Documentation compliance
Fully compliant
Quality compliance
Not defined
Compliance
Compliance system name
Approval of overall compliance
Not defined
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant
Methodological compliance
Not defined
Review compliance
Not defined
Documentation compliance
Not defined
Quality compliance
Not defined
Commissioner and goal
Commissioner of data set
Project Provision of "Chemicals" process-based product environmental footprint-compliant life cycle inventory datasets. Contract number: 070201/2019/819505/SER/ENV.B.1.
Intended applications Implementation of regular Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) studies and Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF) studies exclusively under the specified Product groups and sectors as defined in the Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) and Organisation Environmental Footprint Sectorial Rules (OEFSR) listed in http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/PEFCR_OEFSR.htm
Data generator
Data set generator / modeller
Data entry by
Time stamp (last saved) 2022-11-03T11:28:17.488+01:00
Data set format(s)
Data entry by
Publication and ownership
UUID f6d691ae-025e-4c32-bee2-6137c7bbc60a
Date of last revision 2020-09-02T14:36:45.458645+02:00
Data set version 04.02.000
Preceding Data set version
Workflow and publication status Data set finalised; entirely published
Owner of data set
Copyright Yes
Reference to entities with exclusive access
License type Free of charge for some user types or use types
Access and use restrictions Free of charge for all final users implementing a regular Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) studies and Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF) studies exclusively under the specified Product groups and sectors as defined in the Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) and Organisation Environmental Footprint Sectorial Rules (OEFSR) listed in http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/PEFCR_OEFSR.htm and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the EULA (available at https://ecoinvent.lca-data.com/) exclusively until 31st December 2024. Any use of this dataset or any derivative data not within the specific context of one of the PEF/OEF projects or after the end of 2024 is not permitted.
Access to the data set is restricted to metadata only. Please register to get full access to the data set.
Access to the data set is restricted to metadata only. Please register to get full access to the data set.